Reasons for Rule Consequentialists

This paper explores what a Rule Consequentialist of Brad Hooker's sort can and should say about normative reasons for action. I claim that they provide theory reasons, but doing so requires distinguishing different roles rules in the ideal code. Some code specify while others perform functions. The also discusses choice Consequentialists face how exactly to reasons. It ends by comparing offered Consequentialism with Act Consequentialism, noting seems better able explain moral constraints.